• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

2013年第15届世界肺癌大会(WCLC)靶向治疗相关信息

  [复制链接]
37046 54 老马 发表于 2013-11-24 13:01:31 |
lxlxlx  初中一年级 发表于 2013-11-25 14:19:23 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 湖南长沙
谢谢马大哥,谢谢楼上各位的翻译

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
一步错步步错  大学二年级 发表于 2013-11-25 15:42:21 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 四川资阳
谢谢,期待中.

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
憨豆精神  超级版主 发表于 2013-11-25 16:35:20 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广东广州
这样吃药舒服啊,吃3天停11天。

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
lv1170  初中二年级 发表于 2013-11-25 20:26:12 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 浙江金华
这样吃药好!!!

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
用心良苦  初中三年级 发表于 2013-11-25 20:40:03 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 广东广州
非常感谢各位的辛劳付出!带给我们的一线希望。

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
snow0371  初中三年级 发表于 2013-11-25 22:41:14 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 河南郑州
谢谢老马,期待。。。。

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
costa_na  大学三年级 发表于 2013-11-26 01:09:26 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 四川成都
本帖最后由 costa_na 于 2013-11-26 01:10 编辑

4楼的翻译

P2.11-031 RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF LIVER METASTASES MAY PROLONG THE SURVIVAL OF PULMONARY ADENOCARCINOMA PATIENTS WITH LIVER METASTASIS

对肝转移瘤的射频消融能延长带有肝转移肺腺癌患者的生存期

Shih-En Tseng1, Yi-You Chiou2, Yu-Chin Lee3, Reury-Perng Perng4 Yuh-Min Chen5
1Internal Medicine, Zhongxing Branch, Taipei City Hospital/Taiwan,2Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital/Taiwan, 3Department Of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital/Taiwan, 4Department Of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veteran General Hospital/Taiwan, 5Division Of Thoracic Oncology, Department Of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital/Taiwan

Background: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the development of liver metastasis (LM) is a poor prognostic factor that compromises survival time. Whether combine systemic treatment with local treatment for liver metastases has benefit for NSCLC patients with LM is unknown. How to select a suitable patient for receiving local treatment is also unclear.

背景:在NSCLC患者中,肝部转移(LM)是一个降低生存时间的不良预后因子。在现有的研究中,患者能否从系统治疗联合对肝转移瘤的局部治疗中获益目前还是未知,也不太清楚如何选择合适的患者接受局部治疗。

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 713 pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients and 85 patients that developed LM at any time point in the course of the disease were identified for analysis. We use radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for local treatment of liver metastases. The indication of RFA were liver metastases number less than three with maximal size less than 5cm. RFA was performed with real-time ultrasonography guidance. Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan was done 1 month after RFA for evaluating local therapeutic efficacy. An SPSS version 19 statistical software package (SPSS INC, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis.

方法:我们回顾性的评价了713例肺腺癌患者,和85名在疾病被纳入分析的任何时间点发展至肝转移(LM)的患者。我们使用射频消融(RFA)来对肝转移瘤作局部治疗。使用RFA的指征为肝转移瘤数目小于3个,并且最大直径小于5cm。射频消融采用了实时超声波引导,在射频消融1个月之后使用动态CT扫描来评价局部治疗效果,使用SPSSv19统计软件来进行数据分析。

Results: The independent prognostic factors after LM were Performance status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and LM numbers. There were 47 patients (54.7%) have LM nodules number less than three. The median overall survival (OS) in patients with LM nodules number less than three was 7.9 months comparing with 2.9 months in patients with nodules number over three ( P < 0.001). The independent prognostic factors for LM nodules number less than three patients were performance status and presence of brain metastasis. There were total six patients received RFA. Patients who received RFA treatment had better median OS after LM than those not ( 19.1 v.s 6.0 months, P = 0.04)

结果:在发生肝转移之后,独立的预后因子为:PS(体能状态),EGFR突变状态和肝转移瘤个数。有54.7%(47)的患者具有少于3个的肝转移瘤数目。这部分患者的中位生存期为7.9个月,而有多于3个转移瘤的患者的中位生存期只有2.9个月(P<0.001)。对于转移瘤少于3个的患者来说,独立的预后因子为:PS和脑部转移的出现。总共有6名患者接受了射频消融。接受了射频消融的患者相比未接受治疗的患者来说拥有更好的中位总生存期(19.1 v.s 6.0 months, P = 0.04)。

Conclusion: We recommend patients with better performance status (ECOG <2) without brain metastasis can consider RFA for liver metastases.

总结:我们建议有较佳体能状态(ECOG<2)且不具有脑转移的患者应该考虑对肝部转移瘤作射频消融治疗。

这篇没什么说的了,对于身体好耐受性较好的患者来说,局部治疗+系统治疗肯定比单纯的系统治疗具有更好的生存期,采用RFA的指征可以作临床参考。

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
素月清荷  初中三年级 发表于 2013-11-26 07:29:33 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 河北
谢谢各位的辛苦,让我们看到了最新的消息,增加了信心,谢谢

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
costa_na  大学三年级 发表于 2013-11-26 23:34:53 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 四川成都
本帖最后由 costa_na 于 2013-11-28 14:33 编辑

5楼的翻译

P2.11-044 PHASE IB STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF OLAPARIB (AZD2281) PLUS GEFITINIB IN PATIENTS (P) WITH EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR (EGFR) MUTATION POSITIVE ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) PATIENTS (P). (NCT=1513174/GECP-GOAL)

评估OLAPARIB (AZD2281)联合吉非替尼对带有EGFR突变的晚期NSCLC患者的治疗效果和耐受性的Phase IB研究

Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) vary in P with NSCLC driven by EGFR mutations, suggesting that other genetic alterations may influence oncogene addiction. In our experience, high BRCA1 mRNA expression negatively influenced PFS among EGFR mutant P treated with erlotinib. We hypothesiszed that since olaparib can attenuate and/or prevent BRCA1 expression, the addition of olaparib to gefitinib could improve PFS in these P.

背景:EGFR TKI在治疗由EGFR突变驱动的NSCLC患者中表现了出不同的无进展生存期(PFS)和响应率(RR),提示可能有其他基因的改变影响了癌基因的依赖性。依据我们的经验,在采用erlotinib对EGFR突变患者的治疗过程中,高BRCA1 mRNA表达会对PFS产生负面影响。因为olaparib可以削弱或者阻止BRCA1的表达,我们假定联合olaparib和吉非替尼能够提高这部分患者的PFS。

Methods: This is a Phase IB dose escalation study to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and clinical activity of orally administered olaparib in combination with gefitinib in EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC. In a standard 3+3 design based on toxicity, P were treated with gefitinib 250mg once daily plus olaparib tablets at escalating doses ranging from 100mg BID to 250mg TDS during a 28-day cycle. Steady state Cmax and AUC (AUC0-12) were determined following dosing on Day 7 and 14 of the study and the Day 14: Day 7 treatment ratio calculated to assess the impact on olaparib steady state exposure of dosing in combination with gefitinib

方法:这个Phase IB剂量递增研究主要为了确定在联合吉非替尼治疗EGFR突变患者中,口服给药的olaparib的最大耐受剂量(MTD)、剂量限制毒性(DLT)、药代动力学(PK)以及临床活性。基于毒性的标准3+3设计中,患者每日给药吉非替尼250mg和olaparib片剂,olaparib的剂量递增范围从每日两次(BID)100mg到每日三次(TDS)250mg,以28天为一周期。分别于研究的第7天和第14天测定稳态Cmax和AUC(AUC0-12),并计算第14天与第7天Cmax和AUC的比值,用于评估联合吉非替尼时,对olaparib稳态剂量浓度的影响。

Results: 22P have been included across four dose levels of olaparib: 100mg BID (3), 200mg BID (6), 200mg TDS (6) and 250mg TDS (7). Median age, 65 (range 39-84); male, 6P; PS 0-1, 20P; EGFR TKI treatment-naive, 13P; Most toxicities were G1-2, including anemia, leucopenia, nausea, diarrhea, asthenia, rash and anorexia; G3 drug-related events included lymphopenia (1) and anemia (3). No DLT at dose levels 1, 2, and 3; 3 DLT at dose level 4 (G3 anemia and repeated blood transfusion within 4-6 weeks). Few dose reductions or interruptions for both drugs were needed. 1P died due to pulmonary embolism unrelated to study treatment. 19P were evaluated for response: For those not previously treated P, partial responses (PR) were observed in 8P (72,2%), stable disease (SD) in 3P (27,27%) and no progressive disease (PD) (0%). In previously TKI treated P, 3 (37,5%) PR were observed, 3 (37,5%) SD, and 2 (25,5%) PD. Durable PR and SD were observed in both EGFR TKI-naive and previously treated P.10P are still on treatment. The derived PK parameters were the following: 100mg bid: Olaparib Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:4.60; Day 14:3.53; TR(range) 0.77. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7:24.4; Day 14:18.9; TR:0.79. 200mg bid: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:7.68; Day 14:6.60; TR:0.89. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7:48.6; Day 14:40.0; TR:0.85; 200mg tds: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:8.35; Day 14:8.01; TR:0.96. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7: 34.9*; Day 14: 32.7*; TR: 0.94; 250mg tds: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:9.85; Day 14:9.46; TR:0.97. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7: 44.2*; Day 14: 43.3*; TR: 0.99. *AUC quoted is AUC0-6 not AUCss.

结果:22名患者入组并分布到4个olaparib剂量水平组中,其分别为:100mg BID(3人)、200mg BID(6人)、200mg TDS(6人)和250mg TDS(7人)。中位年龄为65岁(39岁-84岁),男性6人,体能状态(PS) 0-1分患者有20人,未接受过EGFR TKI治疗的患者有13人。最常见的毒性为1-2级,包括:贫血、白细胞减少、恶心、腹泻、虚弱、皮疹和食欲不振。3级药物相关的事件包括:淋巴细胞减少(1人)和贫血(3人)。在第1、第2和第3剂量水平组中未出现DLT。在第4剂量水平组中出现DLT(3级贫血,在第4-6周内反复输血)。对于少部分患者,两种药物都需要降低剂量或者中断给药。1位患者由于治疗无关的肺栓塞而死亡。19位患者纳入了药物响应的评估中:在未经治疗的患者群中,8位患者观察到了部分响应(PR,72.2%),3位患者稳定(SD,27.27%),没有患者出现病情进展(PD,0%)。在之前接受过TKI的患者群中,3位患者PR(37.5%),2位患者SD(37.5%),2位患者PD(25.5%)。在两组患者群中都观察到了长期的PR和SD。有10位患者在继续接受治疗。得到的动力学参数如下:
Olaparib
100mg bid: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:4.60; Day 14:3.53; TR:0.77. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7:24.4; Day 14:18.9; TR:0.79.
200mg bid: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:7.68; Day 14:6.60; TR:0.89. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7:48.6; Day 14:40.0; TR:0.85;
200mg tds: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:8.35; Day 14:8.01; TR:0.96. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7: 34.9*; Day 14: 32.7*; TR: 0.94; 250mg tds: Cmaxss(ug/ml): Day 7:9.85; Day 14:9.46; TR:0.97. AUCss(ug.h/ml) Day 7: 44.2*; Day 14: 43.3*; TR: 0.99.
*AUC quoted is AUC0-6 not AUCss.

Conclusion: This phase IB trial of gefitinib plus olaparib, confirms the tolerability of the combination and the anti-tumor activity seen warrants further exploration in treatment-naive patients. MTD of olaparib was 200mg TDS. Co-administration of gefitinib does not appear to have altered steady state exposure to olaparib. A phase II randomized trial in treatment-naive EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC is planned to start in 2013. The final recommended dose of olaparib will be 200 mg TDS.

总结:这个对于吉非替尼联合olaparib的Phase IB研究证明了联合治疗的可耐受性,获得了在对未接受治疗的患者中作进一步抗肿瘤活性研究的依据。得到的olaparib的MTD为每日三次200mg。联合吉非替尼给药未改变olaparib的稳态浓度。计划2013年在未经治疗的NSCLC患者中展开Phase II随机临床试验。对olaparib最终推荐剂量为每日三次200mg。

olaparib是一种PARP抑制剂,用于BRCA基因突变的卵巢癌患者,这个药也是一波三折,11年PARP临床全面崩盘的时候,AZ宣布放弃olaparib的进一步研发,沉寂了一年多之后,今年又捡起来了强推,EMA最近总算批准了这药的上市申请,具体信息可参阅:

三阴性(雌激素、孕激素受体与HER-2均为阴性)乳腺癌的靶向治疗200907

PARP抑制剂的失败并未彰显临床前研究普遍存在的缺陷

这个是今年9月EMA接受了olaparib的MAA
Marketing Authorisation Application for olaparib accepted by European Medicines Agency

这个是11年宣布放弃olaparib时候的申明(有意思的是,用google搜索“AstraZeneca Olaparib ”,出来的第三个链接就是这个,当初PARP崩溃的场景还历历在目)
AstraZeneca updates on olaparib and TC-5214 development programmes

今年ASCO上发了一个Phase II的结果,还是挺不错的,针对BRCA突变的乳腺癌患者,PFS从4.1月延长到11.2月
Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (SOC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm).

不得不说AZ还是有两把刷子

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1
costa_na  大学三年级 发表于 2013-11-27 13:37:53 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 美国
本帖最后由 costa_na 于 2013-11-28 12:50 编辑

6楼的翻译 - 第一部分

MO21.10 SERIAL MONITORING OF PLASMA EGFR T790M LEVELS AND EVALUATION OF EGFR MUTATIONAL STATUS IN MATCHED TISSUE AND PLASMA FROM NSCLC PATIENTS TREATED WITH CO-1686

MO21.10 对接受CO-1686的NSCLC患者的血液和组织中的血浆EGFR T790M水平的连续监测和EGFR突变状态的评估

Heather A. Wakelee, Chris A. Karlovich, Wei Wen, Jong-Mu Sun, Sean Chien, Elaina Mann, Patrick O‘Donnell, Philipp Angenendt, Rafal Dziadziusko, Leora Horn, David Spigel, Lecia V. Sequist, Benjamin Solomon, Jean-Charles Soria, D Ross Camidge, Jonathan Goldman, Shirish Gadgeel, Mitch Raponi, Lin Wu, Keunchil Park

Background: We explored the minimally-invasive detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA from plasma and studied the concordance of EGFR mutation status between matched plasma and tumor tissue in a cohort of newly diagnosed or relapsed patients with advanced NSCLC. CO-1686 is an oral, potent, smallmolecule irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets mutant forms of EGFR, including T790M and the common initial activating mutations, while sparing wild-type EGFR. Promising clinical activity has recently been reported from an on-going Phase I/II trial.

背景:我们探索了在新诊断出晚期或者复发的NSCLC患者中对血液中游离循环DNA的最小侵入式检测,研究了在对应的血液和肿瘤组织中的EGFR突变状态的一致性。CO-1686是一种口服高效的小分子不可逆TKI,能选择性地靶向突变型的EGFR,包括带有T790M突变以及通常初始激活的突变,同时能避开野生型EGFR。最近来自一项正在进行的Phase I/II期临床已经报告了其有希望的临床活性。

Methods: Matched tumor tissue and blood from 80 Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients, 41 treated with CO-1686, were tested using two allele-specific PCR assays, the cobas EGFR FFPET and cobas EGFR blood tests. Each test detects 41 mutations in EGFR, including the T790M resistance mutation, exon 19 deletions and
L858R. We also used BEAMing, a highly quantitative and sensitive technology based on digital PCR, to assess a subset of 18 patients treated with CO-1686. BEAMing was compared to cobas analysis at baseline, and also used to serially monitor plasma EGFR mutation levels in response to CO-1686.

方法:我们采用两种等位基因特异性PCR方法、cobas EGFR FFPET(福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织)测试和cobas EGFR血液测试,检测来自于80名患者的对应的肿瘤组织和血液样本,其中41位患者已经接受过CO-1686治疗。每项测试检测EGFR的41种突变,包括T790M耐药突变,外显子19缺失突变和L858R错义突变。我们仍然使用基于数字PCR的高量化和敏感性的BEAMing技术,来评估18位接受CO-1686治疗的患者。BEAMing结果将与采用cobas分析的基线数据作对比,同时也被用于对CO-1686治疗响应的血液EGFR突变水平的连续监测。

Results: Using tissue as reference, the positive percent agreement between tissue and plasma was 76% (44/58) for activating mutations and 63% (17/27) for T790M. The cobas EGFR blood test identified two patients with T790M mutations in plasma that were not detected in the corresponding tumor biopsy—likely because of tumor heterogeneity. The M1a/M1b status was known for 63 EGFR mutation-positive patients. Of the 44 with extrathoracic metastatic disease (M1b), 38 were found to have an activating mutation in plasma (86%). Conversely, only 53% (10/19) of EGFR mutation-positive patients with intrathoracic metastatic disease (M1a) had detectable activating mutations in plasma (p = 0.0081). For the 18 patients profiled by BEAMing, the overall percent agreement between BEAMing and the cobas&reg; EGFR blood test was 94% (17/18) for T790M and 83% (15/18) for activating mutations. Nine of the 18 patients had detectable baseline plasma T790M levels, and several patients treated with CO-1686 had an initial decrease in plasma T790M by BEAMing.

结果:使用组织样本做对照,在肿瘤组织和血液样本中的激活突变(19del/L858R)的阳性一致率为76%(44/58),T790M的阳性一致率为63%(12/27)。cobas EGFR血液测试识别出两位患者的血浆中有T790M突变,但由于肿瘤异质性,并未在对应的肿瘤活检样本发现T790M。63位突变患者的分期为已知的M1a/M1b状态。在44位具有胸腔外转移(M1b)的患者中,38位患者被检测出在血浆中具有激活突变(86%)。与此相反,只有53%(10/19)的只含有胸腔内转移(M1a)的患者的血浆中被检测到激活突变(p = 0.0081)。对于采用BEAMing检测的18位患者,BEAMing和cobas EGFR血液检测对于T790M的总一致率为94%(17/18),对于激活突变的总一致率为83%(15/18)。其中9位患者具有可检测的基线T790M血浆水平,部分接受CO-1686治疗的患者表现出对应的血浆T790M水平的下降。

Conclusion: Using the cobas EGFR blood test, a high proportion of EGFR mutations identified in tissue were also detected in plasma. Mutations were more readily detectable in the plasma of patients with M1b rather than M1a disease. These findings suggest that the cobas EGFR blood test and BEAMing can be useful tools for the non-invasive assessment and monitoring of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients.

Untitled.png

总结:在组织样本存在EGFR突变的患者的血液样本中,使用cobas EGFR血液测试能以很高的比例检测到对应的突变。M1b患者具有比M1a患者更高的血液突变检出性。这个发现提示对NSCLC患者来说,cobas EGFR血液测试和BEAMing技术可作为有效的EGFR突变非侵入式评估和监测工具。

感觉这个研究的主要贡献在于能够以更低侵入性的方式检测IV期患者,在接受TKI治疗后的T790M状态,从而更好的指导后续用药。其中提到M1a和M1b的血液和组织的T790M阳性一致率的差别,也是说明即使同为IV期,也需要根据转移灶位置细分为不同的亚组,从而更好的进行针对性的治疗

举报 使用道具

回复 支持 0 反对 1

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表